The Control Paradox
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Humans start
needing to have some measure of control fairly early in life -
possibly from about the time we draw our first breath. It is
ironic, then, that uniquely among all living creatures, we alone
are aware of the inevitability of our eventual death, and
completely without any control whatsoever over when that will
happen. This may explain to some extent why control issues loom
large in the human psyche. No matter how easy going we may want
to imagine ourselves to be, control issues are inescapable. Our
unexamined needs for control can paradoxically put us in prisons
of our own making.
Negotiations with
significant others around issues of control and power can
often be baffling, frustrating and exhausting. For
example, pretty much every parent is familiar with the
seemingly endless struggles one has with one's kids. Are
the most successful parents the ones who exert the most
control? We probably all know kids who grew up under
extremely strict conditions, for whom things did not turn
out so well - unlike the apparently perfect prodigies born
to and raised by Amy Chua, the "Tiger Mother" who is all
over the news these days. I certainly talk to quite a few
people professionally for whom an authoritarian upbringing
was not the way to get to Carnegie Hall, but rather
contributed heavily to their addiction problems,
impotence, divorce, alienation from family, depression and
anxiety - and so on.
In my work with people
affected by authoritarian groups (sometimes such groups
are thought of as cults, or as cult-like), I've talked to
scores of people who joined such a group searching for
freedom of one kind or another: from ego, from inhibition
and fear, emptiness, meaninglessness, etc. Where they
ended up instead was spending some of the best years or
decades of their lives living like slaves, allowing a
charismatic leader to dictate every move they made,
everything they wore, ate, said and did. In all those
years before they finally left their group, they thought
they were on the road to liberation. Michael Wright's
superb recent piece in the New Yorker about how the
screenwriter Paul Haggis got into Scientology, what he put
up with to stay in it, and why he finally left, is a great
illustration of how one can allow oneself to be controlled
by others - all the while deceiving oneself into believing
that the subjugation and exploitation one accepts is all
in the name of self-realization, freedom, and making the
world a better place.
For many who are
struggling to find the right intimate partner, control
issues can be a stealth killer. One strong, highly
accomplished woman I worked with whom I'll call Sonia
easily attracted men who showed intense interest in her.
These were men who seemed masterfully in control - of
their careers, their wealth, their bodies and their sexual
performance. Sonia would eventually become dismayed to
discover that these men also expected to be able to
control her. When she resisted the controlling behaviors,
the man in question would quickly turn from seductive
pursuit to belittling rejection. In spite of the
repetitive disappointments she experienced with men of
this type, she found herself turned off by and made
herself unavailable to men who were less dominating.
Catch-22.
Like Sonia, we all have
unconscious, complicated relational patterns that are
impacting our way of managing our control needs,
especially with our most significant others. If we believe
that it is a basic human right to be free - and today,
more and more people all over the world are beginning to
assert that it is - then it behooves us to understand more
about the need for control. There is a world of
difference between control as a destructive, rigidifying
tool for domination; and control, built on trust,
compassion and respect, that creates stability, allows for
flexibility, and encourages freedom.
©
Daniel Shaw, LCSW 2011
|
|